CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION Nos. 452
14 Aug 2014Multiple writ petitions and a criminal application were filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging police actions of raiding or sto...
Search Results for "prohibition officer"
2272 result(s) found
Found 2272 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Release of Seized Liquor in Prohibition Area - Transportation Through Prohibited District Not Violative of Order Dated 5th March 2015. Mere passage through a district with complete prohibition, without stopping or unloading, does not violate the prohibition order under Section 457 CrPC.
26 Apr 2017The petitioner, M/s. R.M. Jaiswal Wine Shop, through its partner, filed a criminal writ petition challenging orders dated 29.9.2016 passed by the Judi...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Sugar Factory Officials in Prohibition Act Case — Minister's Order Lacks Sanction Under Section 59A. Court holds that prior sanction under Section 59A of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 is mandatory for prosecution of public servants and that a Minister's order without application of mind cannot substitute such sanction.
15 Dec 2017The applicants, Balasaheb Mahadeo Lohar and Rajendra Daulat Dongare, were employees of Gangakhed Sugar & Energy Ltd. They filed a criminal application...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Bootlegging Without Public Order Disturbance. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Law and Order Violations; Nexus to Public Order Must Be Established.
4 Sep 2025The petitioner, Rajendrasingh Bavari, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18.02.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Sec...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Maharashtra Prohibition Act Case — Failure to Put CA Report Under Section 313 CrPC Not Fatal. Possession of 48 Bottles of Illicit Liquor Proved Through Recovery and Panch Witnesses, Conviction Under Section 65(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act Confirmed.
11 Jan 2019The applicant, Sau. Shobha Baburo Shende, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagbhid, under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohib...
- 174
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Maharashtra Prohibition Act Case — No Offence Made Out as Mere Drunkenness Without Public Misbehaviour Does Not Attract Section 85. Section 85 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 Requires Both Being Under Influence of Liquor and Behaving in a Disorderly Manner or Using Abusive Language in a Public Place; Mere Presence in a Public Place Under Influence Does Not Constitute an Offence.
11 Sep 2020The applicant, Jagdish Vasudeo Lanjewar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FI...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Levy of Supervision Costs Under Bombay Prohibition Act. Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Costs from Liquor Licensee Quashed as Without Statutory Authority Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.
24 Feb 2015The petitioner, M/s. Vidarbha Liquor Corporation, a partnership firm holding a liquor license, challenged the retrospective levy and recovery of super...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction — Bootlegger's Preventive Detention Set Aside. The court held that the detaining authority failed to apply its mind to the material and form a genuine subjective satisfaction that the petitioner's activities were prejudicial to public order under the MPDA Act.
24 Nov 2025The petitioner, Ibbu Kashim @ Kasim Nuriwale, a bootlegger, challenged his preventive detention order dated 30/06/2025 passed by the District Magistra...
- 109
High Court
High Court of Bombay Clarifies Powers of Collector under Section 142 of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Court Expands the Scope of "Any Place" in Section 142(1) to Include Multiple Licensed Shops in the Interest of Public Peace.
30 Sep 2024The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of the Collector's powers under Section 142(1) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The petitioners cha...
- 438
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Circular Closing Liquor Shops on Ram Navmi — Section 142 of Bombay Prohibition Act Requires Individual Satisfaction of Collector. Blanket Circular by Commissioner of State Excise Directing All Collectors to Close Licensed Liquor Shops on a Particular Day Held Ultra Vires.
18 Jul 2006The petitioners, Maharashtra Wine Merchants Association and Indian Hotels and Restaurant Association, challenged a circular dated 4th April 2006 issue...
- 45
