Search Results for "procuration"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366(A) and 344 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Ramesh Irappa Mutyannatti and Channappa Irappa Jamboti, were convicted by the VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Additional Charge Under POCSO Act in Kidnapping Case — No Sexual Intent Established. Court holds that mere kidnapping without evidence of sexual assault does not attract Section 7 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The petitioner, accused No.1 in S.C.No.227/2018 pending before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar, challenged the order dated 31.12....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Kadamban, was convicted by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in S.C. No. 274/2012 for offences under Sections 366A (kidn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Conviction Under Section 366-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Inducement or Sexual Intent.

Supreme Court Acquitted the Appellant as the Prosecution Failed to Prove the Victim’s Minority and the Ingredients of Section 366-A IPC Beyond Reaso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Upholds Conviction in Heinous Gang Rape Case: Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Challenged" "Bombay High Court affirms the life imprisonment of two accused, focusing on electronic evidence and delay in the victim’s report."

1. Introduction and Case Background: Facts: The appellants were convicted for gang rape under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, and 506 (II) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape Allegation.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No. 69 of 2008 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli. The appellant in Crimi...