Search Results for "processed fruits"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "processed fruits"

21 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Canned Pineapple Slices and Fruit Cocktail Preserved in Sugar Syrup Are Not Fresh Fruits Under Entry A-23 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Goods subjected to processing and preservation lose their character as fresh fruits and are taxable under the residuary entry.

4 Dec 2025

The case concerns a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tax Classification Appeal -- 'Appellants Product' Held as Fruit Drink Under UPVAT Act -- Appellants Succeeds Against Commercial Tax Commissioner

25 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed appeals filed by Appellants challenging the classification of their product under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Inclusion of Dry Fruits Under APMC Act — Notifications Ultra Vires. Definition of Agricultural Produce Under Section 2(a) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 is Exhaustive and Does Not Include Dry Fruits/Dry Dates.

17 Jun 2005

The petitioner, a partnership firm dealing in dry fruits and dry dates, challenged the validity of notifications dated 20.6.1988 and 18.10.1988 issued...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Market Committee in Market Fee Dispute: Processed Agricultural Produce Imported from Outside State is Liable for Market Fee Under Karnataka APMC Act. The Court held that the Explanation to Section 65(2) of the Karnataka APMC Act excludes the exemption for imported agricultural produce, and the importer is liable to pay market fee under Section 65(2-A)(ia).

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by APMC Yashwanthapura against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had held that the respondent,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Agricultural Marketing Act Case — Processed Goods Not Covered. Notification Adding Sugar, Dry Fruits, and Edible Oils to Schedule Under Section 62 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Ultra Vires.

16 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Britannia Industries Limited, a public company with its registered office in Calcutta and a branch in Bombay, filed a writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jul 2016

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.

18 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case: Commissioner's Decision on Nil Duty Binding on Assessing Officer. Duty on DTA Clearances of Fresh Mushrooms by 100% EOU Held Nil Following Commissioner's Order Under Section 3(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

14 Dec 2012

The appellant, ECO Valley Farms & Foods Limited, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in cultivation, manufacture, and export of fresh/processed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Britannia Industries Ltd. Against Bombay Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Regarding Applicability of APMC Act to Processed Products. Court Holds That Sugar, Edible Oil, and Vanaspati Are 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, and Market Fees Can Only Be Levied on Transactions Within the Market Area.

24 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Britannia Industries Ltd. challenging the applicability of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Market Fee Levy on Tobacco Products Under APMC Act — Tobacco Products Held Not Exempt as 'Manufactured Product' Under Section 2(1)(a) of Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1939. Processing of tobacco into chewing tobacco or gutka does not transform it into a manufactured product; market fee is leviable.

24 Apr 2006

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by companies and their shareholders challenging the levy of market fee on tobacco products under the Bo...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)