Search Results for "privilege leave"

472 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 472 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for PL Encashment Despite Dismissal — Penalty of Dismissal Does Not Forfeit Privilege Leave Encashment Unless Service Rules Expressly Provide. Leave encashment is a vested right and not forfeited by dismissal in the absence of express rule.

The petitioner, G. Linganagouda, a former Assistant Manager of Pragathi Krishna Gramina Bank (now Karnataka Gramina Bank), was dismissed from service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Leave Encashment Entitlement During Dismissal Period in KSRTC. Dispute Involves Interpretation of Mysore State Road Transport Corporation Employees Leave Rules, 1964 and Whether Continuity of Service Grants Earned Leave Without Actual Duty.

The matter involved two writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka concerning the entitlement of a retired KSRTC workman to leave encashment fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal Against Order Directing Payment of Privilege Leave Encashment to Resigned Employee. Employee's Right to Accumulated Leave Encashment Upheld Under Service Regulations.

The respondent, Chandrashekar Hebbar, was appointed as a Probationary Officer in the Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank in 1984 and later promoted. He resi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...