Search Results for "prior representation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "prior representation"

3095 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3095 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition for Mandamus and Damages in Quarrying License Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Make Prior Representation and Damages Involved Disputed Questions of Fact. The Court held that a writ of mandamus cannot be issued without a prior demand for performance of statutory duty, and a claim for damages involving disputed facts is not maintainable in writ proceedings.

8 Jul 2020

The petitioner, D. Shankar, claiming to hold a quarrying license dated 28.09.2015, approached the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Con...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Representation for Rehabilitation of Project Affected Family in BWSSB Water Supply Project. Writ of Mandamus Issued to Respondents to Consider Petitioner's Representation for Allotment of Site/House and Rehabilitation Within Eight Weeks.

16 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Nagamma, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Avail Services of Legal Practitioner in Domestic Inquiry - Right to Representation Under Industrial Disputes Act. The court held that refusal to permit legal representation violates principles of natural justice.

8 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Ajit Bhagwan Sawant, a workman employed by M/s. Parveen Industries Pvt. Ltd., was subjected to a domestic inquiry by the employer. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to be Represented by Lawyer in Domestic Enquiry When Presenting Officer is Legally Trained and Facts are Complex. The court held that under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, a workman is entitled to legal representation if the presenting officer is legally trained and the facts are not simple.

25 Feb 2010

The Petitioner, an employee of Respondent No.1 since 1979, was served a charge-sheet on 8th July 2009 for alleged misbehavior and threats to an office...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Employee to Engage Legal Practitioner in Departmental Enquiry Despite Company Rules Prohibiting It. The Court quashed the order denying legal representation and directed the employer to permit the employee to engage a lawyer, holding that denial violates natural justice when the presenting officer is legally trained.

21 Aug 2023

The petitioner, T Ramesh Babu, a retired employee of United India Insurance Company Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Constitutionality of Section 17 Prohibiting Legal Representation in Senior Citizens Act Proceedings. Petitioner, an Octogenarian, Seeks Declaration That Bar on Advocates is Ultra Vires Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1960.

26 Jun 2023

The dispute arose under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The petitioner, an 82-year-old man, alleged that his son...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Promotion Representation in Service Matter — Writ of Mandamus Sought for Promotion to Accounts Officer Post. Court Orders Respondent to Consider Petitioner's Representation for Promotion with Effect from 16/04/2018 Without Expressing Opinion on Merits.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, an Assistant Accounts Officer in Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. (KPTCL), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Disciplinary Proceedings Over Defence Representative Eligibility. The Court held that service regulations and handbook provisions restricting defence representatives to serving employees must be upheld, and permitting retired employees as representatives is not permissible under the governing rules.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a departmental inquiry initiated by Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank against an employee, who was working as Cashier-cum-Clerk a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Representation to Advisory Board. Failure to Forward Detenu's Representation to Advisory Board Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 10 of MPDA Act.

6 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged an order of detention dated 17 October 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dang...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Representation and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's representation dated 7-9-2004 was not considered by the detaining authority, and the detention order disclosed total non-application of mind.

12 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Sanpreet Kaur Tejpal Singh, wife of the detenu Tejpal Mann Singh, challenged the detention order dated 6-2-2004 passed by respondent N...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)