Search Results for "preparation for dacoity"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Preparation to Commit Robbery Case — No Evidence of Attempt to Commit Robbery or Use of Deadly Weapons. Conviction under Section 398 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused attempted to commit robbery while armed with deadly weapons.

The appellant, accused No.2, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Mandya, for an offence punishable under Section 398 of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Preparation Case Due to Uncorroborated Police Testimony. Conviction under Sections 399, 402 IPC and Section 135 Bombay Police Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Preparation for Dacoity Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Suresh Ramaswamy Iyer, Salim Abdul Kadar, and Ajaykumar Anil Shrivastav, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Dacoity with Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Articles. Conviction Under Sections 396, 457, and 380 IPC Confirmed as Recovery of Stolen Ornaments Soon After Incident Establishes Guilt.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by appellants Noora, Gorakh, and Navnath against their conviction and sentence by the Additional Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Flawed Circumstantial Evidence. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity and Circumstantial Evidence Was Unreliable Under Section 397 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Nagaraja (Accused No.4) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had reversed his acquittal and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Failure to Communicate Grounds of Detention in Language Known to Detenue Renders Detention Unlawful.

The petitioner, Dil Shad, wife of Huseen Kabeer, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging th...