Search Results for "prefabricated buildings"

4 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Resolves Key Issue on CENVAT Credit: Clarifying Inputs vs. Capital Goods" "Balancing Revenue and Industry Needs for a Robust Telecom Sector."

The Supreme Court addressed whether mobile service providers (MSPs) like Bharti Airtel can claim CENVAT credit on excise duties paid for mobile towers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Predeposit Order in Central Excise Case — Prima Facie Case for Total Waiver Established. Structural glazing, once erected, becomes immovable property and is not excisable under Heading 76.10 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

The appellant, MS Alumayer India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in fabrication and erection of structural glazing. They purchase aluminum angles/profiles, glas...