Search Results for "pre-trap mahazar"

4 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case. Appeal Challenges Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act for Accepting ₹1,000 Bribe for Caste Verification Certificate.

The case arose from a complaint filed by Kiran Kumar, a temporary driver with BMTC, who alleged that T. Siddaiah, a First Division Assistant in the Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction of Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Appellant, a surveyor, challenged conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Act, contending that sanction order was invalid and amount received was legal fees.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from the judgment of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Special Case No.67/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Unreliable Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, G B Jagadeesh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Davanagere, in Spl.C.(Lokayukta) No.9/2007 for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r...