Search Results for "poppy straw"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act for Illegal Transport of Poppy Straw Despite Licence. Breach of Licence Conditions Attracts Section 15(c) for Commercial Quantity, Not Section 26.

The appellant, Gangaram, was the driver of a truck carrying 10 bags of poppy straw weighing 415 kg. He was intercepted by Head Constable Shivshankar o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Procedural Non-Compliance in Private Vehicle Search. Conviction Quashed as Search Governed by Section 42, Not Section 43, of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, with Mandatory Requirements Not Met.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, where the appellants were found with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NDPS Proceedings Against Directors for Lack of Conscious Possession. Directors of a transport company cannot be held vicariously liable for illegal transportation of poppy straw by driver without proof of knowledge or connivance under NDPS Act.

The petitioners, Sunil Kumar Koushik and Vijay Kochhar, were accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No. 12/2021-22 registered at Indi Excise Police Station for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Act Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Non-Production of Contraband. Benefit of Doubt Granted as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant was convicted under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for possession of 6 kg 300 g of op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers to Three-Judge Bench the Question Whether Quantity of Mixture or Pure Drug Content Determines Punishment Under NDPS Act. The Court Held That E. Micheal Raj Requires Reconsideration as It Omitted Note 2 of Notification and the Scheme of the Act Treating Preparations as a Whole.

The Supreme Court, in a reference arising from multiple appeals and writ petitions, considered the correctness of the decision in E. Micheal Raj v. In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail Granted to Accused in NDPS Act False Implication Case — Complainant's Application Allowed Due to Serious Allegations of Conspiracy and Tampering of Evidence

The applicant, Rajesh Jaswantlal Solanki, filed two applications under Section 439 CrPC for cancellation of bail granted to the accused persons, Ravin...