Search Results for "pledged jewellery"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and Robbery Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Victim and Witnesses Found Unreliable, Medical and Forensic Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment of acquittal dated 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Hanumantharayappa, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, in Sessions Case No. 81/2013 for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Husband and In-laws in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Soon Before Death Harassment. Demand of Rs. 10 Lakhs Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt; Deceased's Illness and Treatment Records Suggest Natural Causes.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Sandeep Kumar and his parents under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code for dowry death. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 379 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Nilesh, whose body was found in a suitcase near a temple. The appellants, Prajakta Shyam Shelar and Prafulla Mahend...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Triple Murder and Robbery Case — Circumstantial Evidence Found Insufficient to Sustain Conviction. Last Seen Circumstance and Recovery of Stolen Articles Fail to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of three persons, Premchand Jain, his wife Anandi Devi, and their unmarried daughter Preeti, and the robbery of cash a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 394 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole testimony of child witness was not corroborated and identification parade was not conducted properly.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal against the conviction of the appellant-accused for offences under Sections 302, 392, 394 read with 34 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for killing his wife over financial disputes and suspicion of infidelity.

The appellant, Narsing Dhondiba Pol, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the murder of his wife, Aruna, under Section 302 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Love Affair Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the last seen theory coupled with motive and recovery of weapon established the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Satish Ramchandra Bavbande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of Neeta, a 16-year-old girl, under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Deduction for Bank's Settlement of Claims for Stolen Pledged Jewellery. Payment to Constituents for Stolen Jewellery Held Allowable as Business Expenditure Under Section 10(2)(xv) of Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

The case concerned a claim for deduction under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 by a bank for amounts paid to constituents whose p...