Search Results for "patent error"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "patent error"

933 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 933 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Patent in Annuity Payment Dispute — Petitioner's Failure to Pay Annuities Due to Bona Fide Mistake and Lack of Proper Communication from Patent Office. Court held that the Patent Office must give notice before treating a patent as ceased and that the petitioner's application for restoration should be considered on merits under Section 60 of the Patents Act, 1970.

10 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Teijin Limited, a Japanese corporation, was the grantee of Patent No. 207883 in India. The patent was granted on 24th October 2003. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Retired Employees Against Cooperative Bank's SARFAESI Recovery Proceedings. Employees Held Not to Be 'Borrowers' and Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Auction Sale Without Payment of Dues.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of Letters Patent Appeals filed by retired employees of Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank Ltd. against the dismissal of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Combine Causes of Action for Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Under Clause XIV of Letters Patent. Court Holds That Discovery at Preliminary Stage Is Limited to Documents Relevant to Preliminary Issues Under Section 9A CPC.

13 Feb 2014

The Petitioner, SabMiller India Ltd., filed a suit for perpetual injunction against M.P. Beer Products Pvt. Ltd. for infringement of its registered tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Forest Corporation's Appeals Against Reinstatement of Daily Wage Workers. Daily wage employees with 240 days of continuous service are entitled to reinstatement under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

24 Dec 2025

The case involves multiple Letters Patent Appeals filed by the Divisional Manager, Forest Development Corporation, Nashik, against the reinstatement o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

14 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Holds That Letters Patent Appeal Is Maintainable Against Single Judge Decision in Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of Constitution — Maintainability Depends on Nature of Order, Not Label of Jurisdiction Invoked. The Court Emphasized Liberal Construction of Clause 15 of Letters Patent to Remedy Injustice.

17 Mar 2011

This judgment of a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court addresses the recurring question of whether a Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 15 of the Lett...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax on Hire Purchase Components Under Bombay Sales Tax Act — Option Money, Insurance, and Hire Premium Included in Sale Price. Hire Purchase Transaction Constitutes a Sale and Resale Deduction Under Section 8 Not Available.

30 Jan 2015

The case involves two sales tax references under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal. The applicant, M/s. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Letters Patent Appeal Maintainable Against Order in PIL and Validates Judgment Pronouncement by Single Judge After Other Judge Ceases to Hold Office. The court ruled that an order refusing to recall an earlier order in a Public Interest Litigation is a 'judgment' under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, and a judgment prepared and signed by both judges of a Division Bench can be pronounced by one judge after the other demits office.

28 Feb 2006

The case arose from a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the appellant concerning environmental issues in Lonavala. A Division Bench of the Bom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Patent Suit to High Court Under Section 104 of Patents Act, 1970 — Counterclaim for Revocation Mandates Transfer. The court held that upon filing a counterclaim for revocation of a patent, the suit must be transferred to the High Court, and the trial court cannot insist on payment of court fees before taking the counterclaim on record.

6 Jun 2011

The applicant, SERGI Transformers Explosion Prevention Technologies Private Limited, challenged the orders of the learned District Judge, Thane dated ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case Over Supervision Charges. The Court upheld the Arbitral Award disallowing supervision charges, finding no patent illegality in the Arbitrator's interpretation of the contract terms under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and rejected the waiver argument as the objection was raised in the Section 37 appeal.

8 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 August 1979 between the State of Madhya Pradesh and M/s Sal Udyog Private Limited for the supply of Sal s...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)