Search Results for "passenger alighting"

Trending :

Search Results for "passenger alighting"

49 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Death of Passenger Due to Untoward Incident Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124-A of Indian Railways Act, 1989. The Court held that the deceased was a bona fide passenger and the incident of falling from a train is an untoward incident, reversing the Tribunal's dismissal.

19 Apr 2024

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Jayamma, filed an appeal against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru, dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Death Due to Sudden Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident. Parents of Deceased Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 as Deceased Was a Bonafide Passenger.

6 Jun 2023

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 28/04/2017 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal in OA(IIu)/NGP/2015/0213, whereby the Tribunal reje...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Untoward Incident Death Case — Compensation Awarded to Legal Heirs of Deceased Passenger. Death due to accidental fall from train while alighting constitutes an untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and negligence is not a defense.

27 Apr 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against the judgment and award dated 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation to Deceased Passenger's Family in Railway Accident Case — Deceased Was a Bonafide Passenger While Alighting and Walking on Track Due to Lack of Foot Overbridge. The Court held that the deceased remained a bonafide passenger and the incident was an untoward incident under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling the claimants to compensation under Section 124-A.

10 Oct 2022

The appellants, being the widow, son, and mother of the deceased Manohar Gajbhiye, filed a claim under the Railways Act, 1989 before the Railway Claim...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal of Injured Passenger in Railway Accident Claim Case Due to Bona Fide Passenger Status and Untenable Defence of Self-Injury. The Court held that the Railway Claims Tribunal erred in rejecting the claim on the ground that the appellant voluntarily alighted from the train, as the statement to GRP was not conclusive and the appellant was a bona fide passenger.

4 Oct 2022

The appellant, Laxman Ganesh Kanhojia, was a bona fide passenger travelling on 14.02.2018 by Train No. 11040 Up Maharashtra Express from Bhandara to N...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Fall from Overcrowded Train Due to Sudden Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident. Mother of Deceased Bonafide Passenger Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989.

13 May 2022

The appellant, Smt. Ratta wd/o Subhash Meshram, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation for the death of her son, Ravind...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence and Contributory Negligence Not Proved. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as Deceased Was a Third Party and No Breach of Policy Terms Established.

26 Sep 2019

The appellant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and awa...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)