Search Results for "parole extension"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 19(2) of Bombay Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959 as Unconstitutional — Mandatory One-Year Gap Between Parole Releases Violates Article 14 and 21. Rule 19(2) held arbitrary and irrational for imposing blanket bar without considering individual circumstances.

The petitioner, Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal, a life convict undergoing sentence for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, along with other ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Parole Order for Convict in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Arbitrary Rejection and Delay in Execution. Rejection of permanent parole on ground of not applying for regular parole held unsustainable; delay in implementing High Court order violates Article 21.

The appellant, Daulal, was convicted for offences under Sections 148, 448, 304 Part II read with 149, and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Parole for Agricultural Work Despite Prison Overcrowding — Emphasizes Parole as Reformative Tool Under Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Parole Granted to Convict Serving Life Sentence for Murder to Cultivate Land, Subject to Conditions.

The petitioner, Ramesh s/o Girjaram Bansode, a convict serving life imprisonment for murder, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the orders of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Parole Extension Due to Wife's Medical Emergency. Prison authorities directed to consider humanitarian grounds for extension of parole under Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

The petitioner, Hariom Vijay Pandey, a convict lodged in Nashik Road Central Prison, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Aura...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough for Prisoners Despite Past Overstay on Parole — Overstay Not a Permanent Bar Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough) Rules, 1959. The Court held that furlough is a right of a prisoner and past overstay on parole cannot be a permanent bar for grant of furlough.

The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions filed by prisoners whose applications for furlough leave were rejected by the prison authorities o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Prison Offence Case Due to Lack of Sanction — Conviction Under Section 58 of Karnataka Prisons (Amendment) Act, 2022 Quashed as Prosecution Initiated Without Mandatory Previous Sanction Under Section 59 of the Act.

The petitioner, Shakuntala W/o Bhogappa Nayak Desai, was convicted by the V Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Vijayapur in C.C. No. 9213/2022 for an of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Prisoner for Grandmother's Death Rituals Under Rule 19 of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. The Court held that 'near relative' includes grandmother for parole purposes.

The petitioner, Mohammad Wasim Mohammad Imam Bhiwaniwale, a prisoner in Washim District Jail, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Prison Punishment for Overstaying Furlough — Cutting of Remission Modified to One Day for Each Day of Overstay. Principle of Proportionality Applied to Prison Discipline Under Prisons Act, 1894 and Prisons (Bombay Furlough) Rules, 1959.

The petitioner, Buwaji Sahadeo Hazare, a prisoner, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the prison punishment impos...