Search Results for "paddy trading"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Crude Degummed Soyabean Oil Not an Agricultural Product Under Notification No. 53/2003-Cus. Nexus Between Imported and Exported Products Established Under DFCE Scheme.

The appellant, Noble Resources and Trading India Private Limited (formerly Andagro Services Pvt. Ltd.), a government-recognized two-star export house,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Businessman in Essential Commodities Act Case — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Allegations of illegal storage of paddy without license fail as petitioner was a trader and not a miller, and no requirement for license under the Act for mere storage.

The petitioner, Lalit Kumar Jain, a businessman and proprietor of M/s. Preetam Traders, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Gypsum Board Tax Classification Case. Holds that Gypsum Board Falls Under 'Gypsum in All Its Forms' Entry in Rajasthan VAT Act, Taxable at 4%.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Additional Commissioner (Legal), Commercial Taxes, Rajasthan and another against the judgment of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010022932010_1

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Against Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout; Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Under BDA Act, 1976.

Multiple writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by NWKRTC Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Cross Objections Dismissed. Negligence of Deceased Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Applicable, and Multiplier Correctly Applied Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 24.12.2006 involving a KSRTC bus (driven by respondent No.4, Manjunath) and a stationary NWKRTC...