Search Results for "ownership evidence"

3090 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3090 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim for Attachment of Movables in Execution Proceedings — Corporate Veil Lifted as Judgment Debtor's Company Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Goods.

The present chamber summons was taken out by Khanna Rayon Industries Private Limited seeking raising of attachment of movables lying in flat no. 22B, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Possession in Property Identity Dispute. Plaintiff Established Use of Name Pushpa/Pushpalata Interchangeably and Held to Be True Owner of Flat Under Cooperative Society Share Certificate.

This suit involved a dispute between two sisters-in-law over the ownership of a residential flat in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Pushpalata Sohanlal Sharma,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Case for Theft of Vehicle Purchased at Auction — Insurer Cannot Repudiate Claim on Ground of Lack of Insurable Interest When Premium Was Accepted and Policy Issued Reflecting Transferee's Name.

The appellant, M/s. Balwant Singh & Sons, purchased a vehicle at an auction conducted by ICICI Bank, the hypothecatee, after the original owner (third...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Title and Possession. Court holds that mere possession of property documents does not establish ownership and that plaintiffs must prove their title independently.

The plaintiffs, claiming to be owners and in possession of a plot of land in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanen...