Search Results for "owner's ignorance"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Landlord's Bonafide Need Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Concurrent findings on bonafide need and hardship not interfered with under Section 115 CPC as they were not perverse.

The petitioners, original defendants/tenants, challenged the concurrent eviction decrees passed by the trial court and the first appellate court under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Denies Petition to Quash Cheating Charges in E-Rickshaw Sale Case. "Ignorance of Law No Excuse: Court Emphasizes Limited Scope of Quashing Petitions and Upholds Allegations of Cheating"

The Petitioner sought the quashing of criminal proceedings against him for alleged cheating (Section 420 IPC) related to the sale of an unregistered E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order for Provisional Release of Seized iPhones. Ownership Dispute Precludes Release Under Section 110A of Customs Act, 1962.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, appealed against an order dated 23 June 2022 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of suit proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellant Fails to Prove Self-Acquired Property. Joint Family Property Presumed Where Common Funds Used and Possession Shared.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) against the appellant (defendant) seeking partition and separate possession o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Ex-Judicial Officer Challenging Dismissal for Misconduct. Departmental inquiry found to be fair and charges proved, upholding dismissal under Rule 5 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979.

The petitioner, a former judicial officer, challenged his dismissal from service by an order dated 31 October 2006 passed by the Joint Secretary in th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Remands Forest Vehicle Confiscation Case for Fresh Consideration — Appellate Court Failed to Apply Burden of Proof Under Section 61B of Indian Forest Act. Owner's claim of due diligence not properly scrutinized; matter remanded for fresh decision.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by the Authorized Officer/Assistant Conservator of Forest and others against the judgment of the Adho...