Search Results for "overtaking"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Overtaking — State Fails to Prove Negligence in Head-On Collision Between Two Mini Buses Under Sections 279, 337 IPC.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of the accused, Mohandas S. Gawade, who was charged under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 337 (causing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim. Insurer's Liability to Third Parties Not Affected by Violation of Permit Conditions Under Section 149(2) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves two appeals filed by Oriental Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence in Rash Driving Case Due to Mitigating Circumstances — Concurrent Findings of Guilt Under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 MV Act Upheld but Sentence Modified to Period Already Undergone.

The applicant, Deepak Babusing Pardeshi, was convicted by the trial court and the appellate court for offences under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Finding of Contributory Negligence Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence. Parents of deceased motorcyclist awarded full compensation of Rs.60,000 with interest as Tribunal's finding of contributory negligence was based on no evidence.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Shekhar Krishna Kalgutker, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC — Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient. Chain of Circumstances Pointed Only to Guilt of Accused, Appeal Dismissed.

The appellant, Gulabsing Sureshsing Sisodiya, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of the deceased. The prose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reduces Applicant's Sentence in Rash Driving Case; Exonerated of Stalking Charges. Accused receives 36-day imprisonment for rash and negligent driving but cleared of stalking charges under IPC Section 354D.

The Bombay High Court revised the sentencing in a criminal revision application. Applicant was initially convicted for offenses under Sections 279, 35...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows BMTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Motorcyclist. Liability Apportioned Equally Between BMTC and Deceased, Compensation Reduced to Rs.39,55,000/- with 6% Interest.

The appeal was filed by the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC) challenging the judgment and award dated 17.09.2016 passed by the IX A...