Search Results for "ouster clause"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "ouster clause"

255 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 255 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Reinstates Arbitral Award in Manning Agreement Dispute Over Vessel Grounding Penalty. Arbitrator Held to Have Jurisdiction to Interpret Contract and Invalidate Ouster Clause Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, with Limited Judicial Review Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a Manning Agreement dated 26.12.2008 between appellant and the (respondent) for manning 17 vessels. On 06.07.2009, the ves...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Chamber Summons Filed by Defendant for Return of Plaint in Suit for Damages Under Lease Agreement. Application Seeks Transfer to Chennai Court Citing Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause; Court Also Considers Limitation and Cause of Action.

20 Aug 2013

The matter pertained to a chamber summons filed by the defendant in a suit for damages. The defendant, Integrated Finance Co. Ltd., sought return of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Jurisdiction Dispute — Private Agreement Cannot Oust Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226. The Court held that Clause 21 of the All India Chess Federation's Constitution, conferring exclusive jurisdiction on Chennai courts, cannot bar the Bombay High Court from entertaining a writ petition under Article 226.

29 Jul 2019

The present appeal arose from a dispute between the Maharashtra Chess Association (Appellant) and the All India Chess Federation (second Respondent), ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlord's Appeal in Ejectment Dispute, Affirming Occupancy Tenant Status Under Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959. Tenant's Rights Under Section 185(1)(ii)(a) Accrue Even if Tenancy Was Terminated Before Code Commencement, and Pending Ejectment Suit Does Not Bar Such Claim, As Per Majority Interpretation of 'Tenant' and Non-Ouster by Sections 261, 262(2).

27 Jan 1966

The dispute involved a landlord's ejectment suit against a tenant who claimed occupancy rights under the newly enacted Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Cod...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal on Jurisdiction in Employment Dispute Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Exclusive jurisdiction clauses in employment contracts specifying Mumbai courts are binding and oust jurisdiction of other courts where suits were filed in Patna and Delhi under Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

8 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from two civil appeals concerning jurisdiction in employment termination cases. In the lead appeal, an employee, Rakesh, appointed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave to Sue in Summary Suit for Goods Sold and Delivered Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Article 39 of the contract required all legal proceedings only in Calcutta High Court, ousting Bombay High Court's jurisdiction.

10 Feb 2006

The Plaintiff, Pacific Refractories Ltd., filed a summary suit in the Bombay High Court against the Defendant, Stein Heurtey India Projects Pvt. Ltd.,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chamber Summons to Recall Leave Granted Under Clause XII of Letters Patent in Arbitration Matter. Court holds that leave granted ex parte cannot be recalled under inherent powers as it is not a decree or final order, and the proper remedy is to challenge the leave in appeal against the final award.

8 Jan 2013

The petitioners, four individuals, entered into a development agreement on 6 August 2003 with respondent no. 5 as vendors and respondent nos. 1 to 4 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cooperative Court's Order Terminating Lease for Violation of Bye-laws in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute. Leasehold rights terminated due to unauthorized construction and sub-letting without society's consent; purchasers' rights held subject to society's bye-laws.

3 Nov 2023

The dispute pertains to leasehold rights over a plot in Vithalnagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. The society granted a lease of the plot to membe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order to Try Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue in Contract Dispute. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in contract designating Mumbai courts does not automatically oust territorial jurisdiction of Aurangabad court without proper adjudication.

13 Dec 2022

The petitioner, M/s Ghai Construction, filed a suit (Spl. C. S. No. 276 of 2009) in the Civil Court at Aurangabad for recovery of Rs. 652.06 Lakhs fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Challenging Civil Court Jurisdiction in Company Disputes — Alternative Remedy Under Companies Act Does Not Imply Ouster of Civil Court Jurisdiction. The court held that the remedy under Sections 397, 398, 402, and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956 is not equally efficacious as a civil suit for declaration and injunction, and therefore the civil court retains jurisdiction.

20 Jun 2005

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from S.C. Suit No.3789 of 1995 and S.C. Suit No.3790 of 1995 filed in the City Civil Court a...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)