Search Results for "order 47 rule 1"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "order 47 rule 1"

26 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

10 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Sayla Realtors, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated September 25, 2025. By that orde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Sale of Housing Board Site, Upholds Validity of Sale Deed and Rejects Review Petition. The court held that the petitioner lacked locus standi and the sale was validly executed by the Karnataka Housing Board in favor of the trust.

30 Sep 2021

The petitioner, Mr. Adinarayanasetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, styled as a public interest litig...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Rejects Review Petition for Lack of Error Apparent on Record. Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Ground for Review Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

3 Jul 2020

The petitioner, C. Sreenivasan, filed a review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking revi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Secondary Evidence of Will in Civil Suit. The court held that the trial court's discretion to allow secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No.126/2006, challenged the order dated 20th July 2015 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Sen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

8 Jun 2016

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Debt Recovery Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner failed to deposit amount as directed, and no grounds for review were made out.

5 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s MRB Roadconst. Pvt. Ltd., filed a Review Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated 10th June 2015 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment and Review in Civil Suit — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Orders Under Order VI Rule 17 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. The court held that the trial court correctly applied the due diligence requirement for amendment after trial and that review was not warranted as no error apparent on the face of the record was shown.

6 Feb 2013

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs in Civil Suit No. 34/2009 before the Adhoc District Judge I, South Goa, at Margao, filed a writ petition under Ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application in Service Matter — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on face of record; re-argument of merits not permitted.

11 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Arun Bhaduji Bansod, filed a review application under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking review of an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Caste Scrutiny Case — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Court holds that review jurisdiction is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as an appeal.

24 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Umesh Narsing Jadhav, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking review of the judgment dated 24.3.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Nariman Point Car Parking Project Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as an appeal.

6 Oct 2005

The petitioners, Nariman Point Association and another, filed a review petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)