Search Results for "oppression and mismanagement"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Protection in Oppression and Mismanagement Petition Under Companies Act, 2013. Court Extended Restraint on Construction and Permitted Limited Protective Works to Preserve Subject Matter of Dispute Pending Adjudication by NCLT.

The dispute arose from a company petition filed by the appellants under Sections 241, 242, 244, and 59 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging oppression...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Proceedings – Interim Relief – Failure to Issue Shares – Protection of Investment. High Court Granted Interim Relief Protecting Investment of Foreign Investor After Company Failed to Allot Shares Despite Utilizing Funds for Debt Clearance

Misappropriation of investment funds occurs not just by siphoning money but also by enjoying benefits of an investor’s funds without fulfilling corr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Examination of Share Dispute in Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Supreme Court overturns NCLT and NCLAT rulings, directing a re-examination of evidence in share transfer and oppression claims.

Legal Background: The appellants sought rectification of the Register of Members of Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd. under Sections 59 and 88 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Company Law Dispute Over Maintainability of Oppression and Mismanagement Petition. Nomination Under Section 72 of Companies Act, 2013 Vests Rights in Nominee, Excluding Legal Heirs from Claiming Shares for Petition Maintainability Under Sections 241 and 242.

The dispute arose from a family tussle following the death of Mr. Abhey Kumar Oswal, who held significant shares in Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. and Oswal Gr...