Search Results for "opium derivative"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "opium derivative"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail in NDPS Case — Commercial Quantity of Opium Determined by Total Weight, Not Morphine Content. The court held that the Special Judge erred in calculating morphine content to bring the quantity below the commercial threshold, and the bar under Section 37 of NDPS Act applies.

12 Dec 2011

The Union of India filed an application for cancellation of bail granted to the respondents (original accused) by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Pune, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail Granted to Accused in NDPS Act False Implication Case — Complainant's Application Allowed Due to Serious Allegations of Conspiracy and Tampering of Evidence

15 Feb 2011

The applicant, Rajesh Jaswantlal Solanki, filed two applications under Section 439 CrPC for cancellation of bail granted to the accused persons, Ravin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Seizure of Poppy Seeds Under NDPS Act — Poppy Seeds Not 'Opium' or 'Opium Derivative' Under Section 2(xvi) and 2(xvii) of NDPS Act, 1985. Poppy seeds are expressly excluded from the definition of 'poppy straw' under Section 2(xviiid) and are not covered by any definition under the NDPS Act, making their seizure illegal.

28 Aug 2019

The petitioners, Chailbihari Trading Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition challenging the seizure of poppy seeds (khas-khas) by the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Three-Judge Bench the Question Whether Quantity of Mixture or Pure Drug Content Determines Punishment Under NDPS Act. The Court Held That E. Micheal Raj Requires Reconsideration as It Omitted Note 2 of Notification and the Scheme of the Act Treating Preparations as a Whole.

22 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court, in a reference arising from multiple appeals and writ petitions, considered the correctness of the decision in E. Micheal Raj v. In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Conviction under Sections 15, 22, 25 of NDPS Act and Section 18(C) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper authorization and without informing accused of right to be searched before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

8 Oct 2013

The appeal arises from the judgment and order of the Special Court (NDPS) in Special Case No. 3/2011, whereby the appellants, Satpalsingh @ Raja s/o J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in NDPS Act Case, Modifying Sentence on Double Punishment Grounds. Separate sentences for offences under Sections 20 and 25/29 from same transaction held impermissible, and fine cannot be cumulative when sentences run concurrently under Section 53 IPC.

8 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The appellant and a co-accused were intercepted dur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Convicted Drug Trafficker Seeking Transfer to India Under Repatriation Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Compliance with Section 3(1) of Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003

14 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Prem Kishore Raj, was convicted by the Supreme Court of Mauritius on 18th December 1997 for drug trafficking and sentenced to penal se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 — Dexovon Capsules with 70 mg Dextropropoxyphene-HCl Not Liable to State Excise Duty as They Are Not Narcotic Drugs Under the Act. The court held that since the content of Dextropropoxyphene-HCl per dosage unit is below the prescribed limit of 135 mg, the capsules are not narcotic drugs and not subject to State Excise Duty under the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955.

22 Aug 2006

The petitioners, M/s. USV Limited and its Company Secretary, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the levy of State Excise D...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)