Search Results for "obviousness"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "obviousness"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Patent Refusal for Lack of Reasoning on Inventive Step. The Court held that the Assistant Controller's order lacked any reasoning as to how the claimed invention was taught by prior art and failed to apply the five-step test for inventive step under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act, 1970.

15 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Navya Network Inc., filed a petition under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970, challenging the order dated 27th May 2024 passed by ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Patent Refusal Order for Non-Speaking Nature and Violation of Natural Justice. The court set aside the order refusing a patent application for a single-use safety syringe due to lack of independent reasoning and breach of natural justice by deciding on novelty grounds not included in the hearing notice, under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970.

23 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a commercial miscellaneous petition filed under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970, challenging an ord...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of Pre-Grant Opposition Due to Unreasoned Order, Remands to Patent Office. The Court held that the Controller failed to consider affidavits of persons skilled in the art and gave no reasons, warranting intervention under Article 226 despite existence of alternative remedies under the Patents Act, 1970.

25 Mar 2025

The writ petition challenged an order of the Deputy Controller of Patents rejecting a pre-grant opposition filed by Adiuvo Diagnostics Private Limited...

High Court

CMA(PT).No.46 of 2024

18 Mar 2025

Background: This is an appeal filed under Section 117-A of the Patents Act, 1970 by the applicant against the order of the Controller of Patents rejec...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Patent Application for Treatment Decision Engine, Finding Lack of Inventive Step and Subject Matter Exclusion. The court held that the claimed invention constituted a computer programme per se and business method under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970, and was obvious in light of prior art documents D3 and D2.

27 Feb 2025

The appeal arose from the rejection of Indian Patent Application No.951/CHENP/2013 by the Controller of Patents and Designs. The appellant, Navya Netw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Patent Infringement Suit — Appellant's Product Falls Within Scope of Respondent's Patent Claims. Court finds that the appellant's product, a fire protection system for electrical transformers, infringes the respondent's patent IN 202302, and the challenge to the patent's validity is not prima facie tenable.

25 Apr 2023

The respondent, CTR Manufacturing Industries Private Limited, filed a suit for patent infringement against the appellant, M/s. Tri-Parulex Fire Protec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Claim Over Domain Name 'secondshaadi.com' — Finds 'Shaadi' Generic and Descriptive. Plaintiff's mark 'Shaadi.com' lacks distinctiveness for exclusive use; no likelihood of confusion as 'secondshaadi' denotes a different service.

14 Sep 2016

The Plaintiff, People Interactive (India) Private Limited, owner of the well-known matrimonial website 'Shaadi.com', filed a suit against Vivek Pahwa ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Challenge to Government's Power to Nominate University Syndicate Members Under Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000. Section 39(1) Held Valid and Not Ultra Vires Sections 28(g) and 38 of the Act.

15 Jul 2013

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of Section 39(1) of...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)