Search Results for "notice under Section 111"

551 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 551 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit: Sun Pharma's 'SUN' Mark Protected Against 'ABSUN'. Deceptive similarity established as dominant feature 'SUN' is common; addition of prefix 'AB' insufficient to distinguish under Section 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, Satej M. Katekar, proprietor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice Under Section 111 CrPC for Non-Application of Mind and Vague Allegations — Use of Printed Proforma Without Recording Reasons Renders Notice Invalid

The petitioner, Ruben Franco, challenged a notice dated 6/01/2017 issued under Section 111 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the Deputy Colle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chapter Proceedings Under Section 107 CrPC Based on Single FIR Without Independent Material. Mere Registration of Criminal Case Insufficient to Justify Preventive Action Under Section 107 CrPC.

The petitioners, Sandeep Shivaji Mhatre, Tushar Bhimsen Saigaokar, and Nilesh @ Sonu Mahanand Jadhav, filed three separate criminal writ petitions cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Act Case — Confiscation and Penalties Quashed for Lack of Mens Rea. Imported capital goods released on payment of duty; no deliberate intent to evade duty established under Sections 111(d), 111(f), 112(a), and 125 of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioners, M/s. Central Cables Limited (a company manufacturing electric wires and cables), its Managing Director Govind Daga, and Purchase Offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chapter Proceedings for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements Under Sections 110(e) and (g) CrPC. Failure to Record Separate Order and Furnish Copy to Accused Renders Proceedings Illegal.

The petitioners, Vijay Purshottam Salvi @ Tambat, Sanjay Govind Naidu, and Shivaji Ravindra Kumbhar, filed three separate criminal writ petitions chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice for Special Meeting of Zilla Parishad to Change Subject Committees — Violation of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Notice Held Vague and Not in Compliance with Section 65 of the Act and Rules.

The petitioner, a Councillor of Zilla Parishad, Amravati, challenged a notice dated 17/2/2011 issued by the President of Zilla Parishad convening a sp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Confiscation Case — Goods Not Liable for Confiscation Under Section 111(d) or 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962. Supplier's Innocent Involvement and Lack of Misdeclaration by Respondent Lead to Dismissal.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Trusteeship in Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust Dispute. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove valid appointment as trustees and that the suit was barred by limitation and lacked cause of action.

The plaintiffs, nine individuals, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that they are trustees of the Breach Candy Swimming Bath...