Search Results for "non-refundable deposits"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "non-refundable deposits"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Over Bank Guarantee Validity - High Court's Direction to Substitute Bank Guarantee Set Aside as Appellant Complied with Original Order for Scheduled Bank Located in India Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from special leave petitions filed by SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation against Pow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Amount Under Joint Note. The court held that the three-day condition imposed by the bank was arbitrary and unreasonable, and that the petitioner's substantive right to pension could not be defeated by a procedural technicality.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Sugar Factory Tax Case — Interest on Non-Refundable Deposits Not Taxable as Income. Following Supreme Court precedent, the Court held that non-refundable deposits from members are capital receipts and interest thereon cannot be treated as income of the cooperative sugar factory.

27 Feb 2012

The case involved a tax appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, a cooperative sugar factory. The p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Funds Collected by Sugar Cooperative from Cane Growers Held Not Trading Receipts. The Court followed Supreme Court precedent in CIT v. Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (270 ITR 1) and its own Division Bench in Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. CIT (229 ITR 1) to hold that various funds and deposits collected from cane growers are not trading receipts.

8 Aug 2005

The Revenue appealed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had deleted additio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds ITAT Decision on Non-Refundable Deposits Not Being Trading Receipts in Sugar Cooperative Case. Funds collected from sugarcane purchase price held not to be trading receipts following Supreme Court precedent in Bazpur Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd.

5 Jul 2005

The case involves a reference under the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Revenue against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in favor...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)