Search Results for "no evidence"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in CRPF Departmental Proceeding Case Due to Lack of Vital Witnesses. High Court's Order Setting Aside Penalty Upheld as Departmental Proceedings Suffered from Serious Lacuna in Not Examining Key Witnesses Under Section 11(1) of CRPF Act, 1949.

The case pertains to a departmental proceeding initiated against Suresh Kumar Singh, a constable in the CRPF, on charges of misconduct under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Mother in POCSO Abetment Case — No Evidence of Intentional Aiding. Section 17 POCSO Act requires mens rea and overt act; mere presence or failure to protect insufficient for conviction.

The appellant, Asha Patil, was convicted under Section 17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) for abetting the se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Claims Without Evidence. Claimant Failed to Prove Underutilization of Resources and Extra Overheads, Rendering Award Perverse Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s Kamal Constructions, was the original claimant in an arbitration against the Union of India and another respondent. The Arbitrator ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitration Award Against Guarantors in Cooperative Bank Dispute — Guarantors Not Liable for Enhanced Credit Facility Without Their Consent. Guarantor Liability Cannot Be Extended Beyond Original Guarantee Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common undated arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order to Reinstate IFS Officer in Disciplinary Proceedings. Court holds that charges of misconduct were not established and that the disciplinary authority's order was based on no evidence.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra and others challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MRT) ...