Search Results for "negotiability"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Short Delivery in Multimodal Transport Due to Limitation Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. The court held that the suit filed beyond one year from delivery was time-barred and plaintiff failed to prove short delivery.

The plaintiff, M/s. Assobhai Bhanji and Sons, a registered partnership firm engaged in import and export of dairy and agro products, filed a suit agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for Dishonour of Cheque Issued for Repayment of Loan. Accused's Defence of Loan Repayment and Blank Cheque Fails as Presumption Under Sections 118 and 139 of N.I. Act Stands Rebutted.

The petitioner, B.N. Ashwath Narayan, was convicted by the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in C.C.No.28739/2001 for the offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Complainant Established Debt and Signature Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act, Accused Failed to Rebut.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, K.A. Ananda, against the acquittal of the accused, N. Gangadhara, for the offence under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Answers Reference Against Assessee in Sales Tax Case — Delivery Orders Not Documents of Title. Delivery orders issued by bankers against airways bills are not documents of title to goods and are not negotiable under section 2(4) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930.

The judgment involves multiple Sales Tax References under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, where the common question of law was whether delivery orders...