Search Results for "missing ticket"

36 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Conviction in Wife’s Murder Case, Overturns High Court’s Acquittal. Tagline Child Witness’s Testimony Deemed Reliable; Circumstantial Evidence and Accused’s Silence Under Section 106 of Evidence Act Seal Conviction

Child Witness : Competency, Tutoring, Corroboration-The Supreme Court held that the testimony of a child witness is admissible if the child is c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Consideration of Mitigating Circumstances in a Criminal Appeal. Examining the Impact of Personal History and Lengthy Incarceration on Sentencing

Case concerning a convict accused of the offense punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant, who was married to the deceased...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Claimants in Railway Accident Case — Holds That Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Was Accidental. The Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Grounds of Untruthful Evidence and Failure to Prove 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The present appeal was filed by the original applicants, the widow and minor children of Jagannath Vibhute, challenging the judgment and award dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajaykumar s/o Sambhunath Naik, was convicted by the Special Court, Chandrapur under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Mayur Mulji Parmar and Bharat Mulji Parmar, were convicted by the Sessions Court, Mumbai, for the murder of an unknown woman and for c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 120-B read with Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove conspiracy and murder beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 3, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Section 120-B simplicitor, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Drug-Laced Banana and Theft Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 328 and 379 IPC set aside as sole witness failed to identify accused in court and prosecution failed to prove administration of intoxicating substance.

The appellant, Rajesh Jatihusain Ansari, was convicted by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 328 (administering...