Search Results for "misbranded insecticide"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "misbranded insecticide"

7 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet in Insecticide Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. The court held that the complaint was not filed by a duly authorized Insecticide Inspector and no valid sanction was obtained under Section 31 of the Insecticide Act, 1968.

15 Oct 2025

The applicant, Tajraj s/o Yadorav Chavhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIR No. 0244/2023...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Insecticide Misbranding Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Trial Procedures. Failure to Send Sample for Analysis to Central Insecticides Laboratory and Obtain Analyst Report Before Filing Complaint Renders Prosecution Invalid Under Insecticides Act, 1968.

6 Nov 2017

The petitioners, M/s Bayer Crop Science Ltd. and M/s Sai Agro Agencies, were aggrieved by the initiation of criminal proceedings against them in Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company Officials in Insecticide Act Case Due to Non-Joinder of Manufacturing Company and Expiry of Sample Shelf Life. The court held that without the company being arraigned as an accused, vicarious liability cannot be imposed on its officers, and the expiry of the sample's shelf life deprived the accused of their statutory right to get the sample tested from a third laboratory under Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968.

22 Jan 2018

The petitioners, accused Nos. 2 and 3 in R.C.C. No. 479/2015 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Parbhani, filed a criminal writ petition un...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Insecticides Act Case Due to Limitation Bar. Complaint Filed Beyond Three-Year Period from Date Offence Known to Complainant, Violating Sections 468 and 469 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and Alleging Misbranding Under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 of Insecticides Act, 1968.

4 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal arising from a Special Leave Petition, where the appellants, a company and its managing director, c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Senior Manager in Insecticide Misbranding Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Applicant, a Senior Manager Production, not being a partner or director, cannot be held liable under Sections 29 and 33 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 without specific averments of his role in the alleged offence.

22 Nov 2017

The applicant, Jai Kumar Sedha, a Senior Manager Production at Biostadt India Limited, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Insecticides Act Case Due to Delay in Filing Complaint Depriving Accused of Right to Second Sample Testing. The court held that the inordinate delay in filing the complaint under Sections 29(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, which deprived the accused of the right under Section 24(3) to have the second sample tested by the Central Insecticides Laboratory, warranted quashing of the proceedings.

10 Apr 2017

The applicants, M/s. Rallis India Limited and its factory manager, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seed Inspector's Entry and Seizure Without Authorization Under Seeds Act, 1966. Entry and seizure of seeds from storage area without prior authorization under Section 14 of Seeds Act, 1966 held illegal and without jurisdiction.

21 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of research, ...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)