Search Results for "mis-statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "mis-statement"

85 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show-Cause Notice Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — DGGI Officer Not Authorized as Proper Officer. The court held that only officers specifically authorized by the Commissioner can issue notices under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the DGGI officer lacked such authorization.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s NCS Pearson Inc., a Minnesota-based corporation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

High Court

Quashing of Show Cause Notice issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 – Applicability of Policy Circular and Doctrine of Res Judicata – Prospective and Retrospective Clarification of Foreign Trade Policy, 2004–2009

7 Feb 2025

The High Court of Bombay quashed and set aside the Impugned SCN, holding that it was barred by the doctrine of res judicata and constituted an arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice in GST Discount Case — No Interference at Pre-Adjudication Stage. Limitation and Retrospective Effect of Circular Can Be Raised Before Adjudicating Authority Under Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017.

14 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Apollo Tyres Limited, challenged a show cause notice dated 2 August 2024 issued by the Additional Director, Directorate General of GST...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Limitation Issue - Extended Period Invoked for Differential Duty Demand Based on Transfer of Advance Licenses. The Court remanded the matter to CESTAT for fresh consideration on whether the assessee's bonafide belief based on a Tribunal decision later reversed by the Supreme Court precludes invocation of extended period under Section 11A(1) proviso of Central Excise Act, 1944.

4 Jul 2023

The present appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Trib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Evidence of Suppression. CESTAT's finding that there was no misdeclaration or suppression of facts by the importer upheld, and the demand for differential duty beyond normal period was barred by limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

21 Sep 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import) filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against an order of the Customs Excise and S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Registration of Charge Under Companies Act — Petitioner Company Failed to Discharge Debt and Opposed Registration of Charge by Creditor; Court Held That Registration of Charge Is Not Dependent on Consent of Borrower and That the Remedy of Appeal Under Section 10F of Companies Act Is Available.

5 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Pearl Engineering Polymers Ltd., a company engaged in polyester chips manufacturing, had borrowed funds from respondent No.4 (AFIC) by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rape and Cheating Case Against Applicant in Matrimonial Portal Dispute — No Prima Facie Case of Rape or Deception Established. Relationship was Consensual and Complainant was Aware of Applicant's Marital Status and Identity.

6 May 2015

The applicant, Nandan Sadanand Bendarkar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice and Retrospective Amendment to Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 — Upholds Validity of Officers' Powers and Amendment.

3 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Sunil Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a show caus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exemption Under Notification No.223/88.

24 Aug 2010

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Rajkumar Forge Limited and its director challenging orders of the Commissioner of Central...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)