Search Results for "mis-declaration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "mis-declaration"

42 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Penalties on Customs Broker for Importer's Misdeclaration — No Mens Rea or Knowledge of Fraud Established. Section 112(a), 112(b), 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 require active involvement or knowledge for penalty imposition on customs broker.

22 Jan 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Mathuradas Narandas and Sons Forwarders Ltd., a customs broker, was engaged by GKR Traders Pvt. Ltd., the importer, to facilitate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Customs Mis-declaration Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invocable Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion. Importer's Mis-declaration for Claiming Notification Benefit Does Not Automatically Attract Penalty Under Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962.

22 Sep 2005

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Revenue) against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.

20 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by State Power Entities Against APTEL Order Deleting Misdeclaration Penalty. Penalty for Misdeclaration of Declared Capacity Requires Proof of Intent or Negligence Under Punjab State Grid Code Regulations.

1 Jan 2026

The case involves appeals by Punjab State Load Despatch Centre (PSLDC) and Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) against the judgment of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Commissioner of Customs' Appeal Against Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Anti-Dumping Duty Demand. Tribunal Correctly Found Show Cause Notices Lacked Basis for Reclassification and Anti-Dumping Notification Did Not Cover Goods Under Declared Tariff Heading CTH 40021100 Under Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

21 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Pune against a judgment of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appe...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Provisional Release of Seized Goods in Customs Act Case — Directs Release on Bond and Bank Guarantee. Importers Granted Relief as Court Holds Continued Detention Causes Hardship Under Section 110A of Customs Act, 1962.

3 Feb 2026

The judgment concerns a batch of Special Civil Applications filed by various importers (including M/s. S. J. S. International) against the Union of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeals in DEPB Overvaluation Case — Finds No Evidence of Overvaluation or Fraud. Revenue's reliance on market enquiry and statements of third parties insufficient to prove that exported automobile parts were overvalued for DEPB benefits under Customs Act, 1962.

13 Apr 2015

The appellant, M/s Advance Netways Marketing Pvt. Ltd., was an exporter of automobile parts such as door bidding, fuel pump fitting, front suspension ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

27 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Conflict Between High Courts on Settlement Commission Jurisdiction Under Customs Act — Personal Liberty and Right to Settle Disputes Under Chapter XIVA of Customs Act, 1962. The Court directed the matter to be placed before the Chief Justice of India due to divergence of opinion between Bombay and Delhi High Courts on whether an accused can approach the Settlement Commission after arrest.

4 May 2023

The present writ petition was filed by Yamal Manojbhai, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI), under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, raising an issue o...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeals of Gold Smuggling Accused in Customs Act Case — Confirms Tribunal's Finding of Involvement in Smuggling Conspiracy Based on Documentary Evidence and Circumstantial Links. The court held that the presence of incriminating documents and the modus operandi of using eligible passengers to smuggle gold jewellery established the appellants' involvement in the smuggling network under the Customs Act, 1962.

10 Jan 2025

The case involves 16 Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging a common order dated 24.12.2009 of t...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)