Protecting Consumer Clarity in Pharmaceutical Markets
13 Jun 2024The case involves a dispute over trademark infringement between the plaintiff's "ZITA-MET" and the defendant's "XIGAMET" in the pharmaceutical sector....
Search Results for "medicinal products"
48 result(s) found
Found 48 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit: Sun Pharma's 'SUN' Mark Protected Against 'ABSUN'. Deceptive similarity established as dominant feature 'SUN' is common; addition of prefix 'AB' insufficient to distinguish under Section 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.
22 Apr 2026The plaintiff, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, Satej M. Katekar, proprietor...
- 92
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Heinz India and GSK, Classifies Nycil Prickly Heat Powder as Medicated Talcum Powder Under Sales Tax Acts. Product Held Not to Be Medicine Despite Medicinal Properties Due to Specific Statutory Entries Including Medicated Talcum Powder Under Entry 127 of KGST Act and Toilet Powder Under Entry 1(iii) of TNGST Act.
4 May 2023The Supreme Court dealt with appeals concerning the classification of Nycil Prickly Heat Powder under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (KGST Act...
- 148
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cadila Pharmaceuticals in Passing Off Action by Medley Laboratories. Marks 'HB TONE' and 'RB TONE' Held Deceptively Similar for Pharmaceutical Products, Injunction Confirmed.
8 Apr 2011The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellant (original defendant) for infringement and passing o...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.
21 Jan 2014The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off in Pharmaceutical Product 'ONCO BCG' - Defendant's Mark 'BCG ONCO' Held Deceptively Similar Despite Common Descriptive Element 'BCG'.
14 Jun 2011The plaintiff, Serum Institute of India Limited, a pharmaceutical company, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against Green Sign...
- 128
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.
2 Jul 2019The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...
- 252
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Aglowmed Limited v. Aglow Pharmaceuticals Private Limited. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'AGLOWMED' held infringed by defendant's use of 'AGLOW' for pharmaceutical products, and defendant restrained from using deceptively similar name.
30 Jul 2019The plaintiff, Aglowmed Limited, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, Aglow Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, from us...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks 'MONTINA' and 'MONTINAL'. Phonetic Similarity Between Registered Mark 'MONTINA' and Defendants' Mark 'MONTINAL' for Medicinal Preparations Constitutes Infringement Under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
24 Dec 2013The Plaintiff, Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, who were manufacturin...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Interlocutory Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'CHERI' vs 'MULTI CHERRY' — Preliminary Issue Under Section 9A CPC Pending. The court declined to hear the ad-interim application due to procedural bars: the Appeal Court's order in the Clause XIV leave appeal and the Defendants' application for a preliminary issue on jurisdiction under Section 9A CPC.
24 Jun 2015The Plaintiffs, Indchemie Health Specialties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and...
- 72
