Search Results for "mechanical excavation prohibition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "mechanical excavation prohibition"

5 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Change of Land Use for Cement Plant in Sangrur Due to Violation of Master Plan and Environmental Norms Under PRTPD Act and Pollution Control Regulations

13 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) and writ petitions challenging a Change of Land Use (CLU) granted fo...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of Contribution to District Mineral Foundation Under Rule 45(1A) of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 — Rule Held Ultra Vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed demands for DMF contribution as a condition for mineral dispatch, ruling that Rule 45(1A) is beyond the rule-making power under Section 15 of the MMDR Act.

7 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by mining lessees challenging the demand for contribution to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund for Unexcavated Sand in Auction Contract Dispute — State Cannot Retain Money for Non-Excavated Material Without Justification. The Court held that the State's rejection of refund was arbitrary and that the petitioner is entitled to refund for sand not excavated due to the State's own illegal prohibition on mechanical excavation.

8 Jan 2020

The petitioner, M/s. Wasim Khan Material Suppliers, participated in a public auction on 16.01.2015 for the right to excavate sand from Godegaon Sand G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Mechanical Reproduction of Police Report Without Independent Satisfaction by District Magistrate.

26 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Anant Manikrao Kachale, an agriculturist from Vaitagwadi, Parbhani, challenged his preventive detention order dated 24-08-2017 passed ...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)