Search Results for "mandatory waiting period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "mandatory waiting period"

151 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Waiver of Six-Month Waiting Period Under Section 13B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act in Mutual Consent Divorce Case. Court Holds That Statutory Cooling Period Is Directory and Can Be Waived When Marriage Has Irretrievably Broken Down and Parties Have Been Separated for Over One Year.

13 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had upheld the Family Court's refusal to waive the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servant in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony suffered from material contradictions.

11 Jan 2018

The appellant, Dattatraya Bhagwan Omase, a public servant working as a Junior Engineer with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Lim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging MCGM Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act — Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar of Section 527 of MMC Act and Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 354A(3). The court held that the civil court's jurisdiction is barred when a statute provides a complete mechanism for redressal.

9 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Akash Impex, a registered partnership firm, acquired suit property Gala No.24/25, CTS No. 240-C at Khetani Industrial Estate, Kurl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Waiver of Statutory Cooling-Off Period in Mutual Consent Divorce Case Due to Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage. Court Holds That Section 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Is Not Mandatory and Can Be Waived to Prevent Hardship When Parties Have Been Living Separately for Over Three Years.

7 May 2015

The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging an order dated 8 April 2015 passed by ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Video Conferencing for Conciliation in Divorce by Mutual Consent Case. The Court held that Section 9 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 and Section 23(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 do not mandate physical presence and that video conferencing is permissible to facilitate conciliation when a party resides abroad.

9 Mar 2026

The petitioners, a married couple, filed a joint petition under Section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for divorce by mutual consent. The marr...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Video Conferencing for Conciliation in Divorce by Mutual Consent Case Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court held that the Family Court must adopt a pragmatic approach and permit a party residing abroad to participate in conciliation via video conferencing to facilitate settlement.

9 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Palakben Ravi Luni (Petitioner No. 1) and her husband (Petitioner No. 2), filed a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Suit and Interim Application in Asset Reconstruction Dispute — Upholds Validity of Assignment of Debt and Security Interest. Court holds that an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) is entitled to enforce security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) after valid assignment of debt.

15 Apr 2026

The Applicant, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, an Asset Reconstruction Company registered with the RBI, filed a Commercial Suit (COMSS No. 124 of 2025) a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs State of Goa to Notify SOTTO and Implement Organ Transplant Rules Under Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994. The court held that failure to notify SOTTO and create transparent waiting lists violates the Act and Rules, affecting the right to health of patients.

7 Aug 2019

The Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by The Mango Foundation (TMF), a registered non-profit organization,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBEC Circular on Service Tax Refund for Exporters — Circular Held Ultra Vires Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 93 of Finance Act, 1994.

1 Feb 2013

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies including Larsen & Toubro Limited, Uhde India Private Limited, Tata Tel...

High Court

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

27 Mar 2026

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)