Search Results for "lumpsum exgratia"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "lumpsum exgratia"

4 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim Against Canara Bank for Delayed Processing of Application. The court held that the bank's conduct lacked human sensitivity and directed consideration of the application under the 2005 Scheme.

29 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Mahesh Singh Bisht, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of Canara Bank refus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Family Pension Claim Under CRPF Rules — Liberal Interpretation of 'Family' Includes Widow Despite Husband's Remarriage. The Court held that the definition of 'family' under Rule 5 of CRPF Rules, 1971 includes the first wife, and denial of pension would be unjust.

26 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Smt. Ranjana w/o Bhaskar Anasane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking family pension as the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Compassionate Appointment for Disabled Son of Former Bank Employee. Voluntary Retirement on Medical Grounds Does Not Create Entitlement to Compassionate Appointment Under Canara Bank Pension Regulations.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Pramod Govind Sagalgile, was an employee of Canara Bank who joined as a Clerk in 1989 and was later promoted to Officer. Due to seriou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Ex Gratia Payment Under Section 7(2)(xiv) of Maharashtra Mathadi Act Does Not Bar Workmen's Compensation Claim. The court interpreted Section 16 of the 1977 Act as not precluding a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, since ex gratia payment is not compensation under the 1923 Act.

19 Aug 2019

The case involves a reference by a Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court on the question whether an employee who has received ex gra...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)