Search Results for "literary merit"

51 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Author and Publisher in Obscenity Case Under Section 292 IPC, Finding Story Not Obscene as Moral Element Predominated. Conviction Quashed After Court Applies Overall View Test, Holding Story Did Not Deprave or Corrupt Readers.

The appellant, author Chandrakant Kalyandas Kakodar, and the printer-publisher were convicted under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code for publishin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Cross Arbitration Petitions Challenging Copyright Royalty Award. License Fee and Infringement Claims Under Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 34 of Arbitration Act Evaluated.

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. (IPRS), a copyright society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957, and Entertainment Network...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case, Restrains Defendants from Selling Allegedly Copied Books. Court finds prima facie case of substantial copying of plaintiff's literary works on Indian Economy and Polity by former students.

The appellant, Ranjan Vasudeo Kolambe, filed a Commercial Appeal From Order under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Copyright Infringement Case for Technical Drawings of Flash Lights. Court holds that copyright subsists in technical drawings under Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957, and that reproduction in a three-dimensional form constitutes infringement.

The plaintiff, Photoquip India Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against Delhi Photo Store and Sunlight Industries, alleging that the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Suit Against Film 'Baaghi' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Works. The court held that similarities were at the level of general ideas, not protectable expression under the Copyright Act, 1957.

The Plaintiffs, XYZ Films LLC, PT Merantau Films, and Sikhya Entertainment Private Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against UTV Motion Pic...