Search Results for "liftmen"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "liftmen"

4 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award in Retrenchment Dispute. Retrenchment of 12 Liftmen Held Illegal as Management Failed to Prove Abandonment of Service and Compliance with Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

24 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Welcomgroup Searock, which manages the Searock Hotel in Bandra, Mumbai, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 15th Febr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions of Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Its Classification as an 'Industry' Under the Industrial Disputes Act. The court held that a housing society engaging watchmen and liftmen is an industry under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, following the precedent in SOM Vihar case.

28 Mar 2005

The Bharatiya Friends Co-operative Housing Society Limited filed two writ petitions challenging the judgment and order of the Labour Court in Complain...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of Security Guards by Housing Society — No Employer-Employee Relationship Established Between Security Board and Guards Under Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981. The court held that the Security Guards Board is not the employer and the union has an alternative remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Providing Preference to Locals in Appointment of Peon in Private School — Schedule F to MEPS Rules Does Not Provide for Promotion but Only Preference. The Court held that the Government Resolution dated 15th April 1991 is valid and Schedule F provides only a preference in appointment, not a right to promotion under the MEPS Act, 1977.

26 Oct 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by Tanaji Madhukar Barbade against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner was appointed as a peon...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)