Search Results for "level crossing accident"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Claimants' Appeal in Railway Accident Case, Enhances Compensation for Death of Anil Jindal. Negligence of Railway Administration Established as Train Hit Deceased at Unmanned Level Crossing Without Warning.

The case arises from a railway accident at an unmanned level crossing in Jalna, where a train hit a vehicle driven by Anil Jindal, resulting in his de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Appeal in Motorcycle Accident Case Due to Lack of Negligence Evidence. Speed-breaker constructed without specification not proven as cause of accident; no liability for damages under law of torts.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the Administrator of the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) against a judgment of the Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident that occurred on 19.04.2011 at about 2.30 p.m. when an ambulance driven by the accused collided with an Alto car,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deemed Fall from Train as Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Recovery of Valid Monthly Season Ticket from Deceased's Body Establishes Bona Fide Passenger Status, Reversing Tribunal's Finding of Trespass.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Milind Balaram Sakpal, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, alleging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302/34 IPC and Section 120B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Conspiracy and Involvement of Accused Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of two individuals, Raja Mohammed (D1) and Raj Mohammed (D2), on the night of 28 December 1990 near Sarayananthal, Pap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Negligence of Locomotive Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs.3,70,600/- awarded to widow of deceased auto-rickshaw passenger killed at unmanned level crossing due to failure of railway to provide adequate safety measures.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident claim where the claimant, Smt. Shankaramma, sought compensation for the death of her husband, Rajani, ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Railways Act Case Due to Lack of Mens Rea. Tractor-trailer crossing railway track without permission does not constitute offense under Section 161 of Railways Act, 1989 as it requires intention to cause damage or obstruction.

The petitioner, Hanumanthanayak, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Holenarsipur, in C.C. No. 3/07 for an offense under Section 161...