Search Results for "legible documents"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "legible documents"

46 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to Illegible Documents Violating Article 22(5). Supplying illegible documents amounts to non-communication of grounds, depriving detenu of effective representation.

29 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Sanjay Soni, challenged a detention order dated 25th January 2012 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Violated by Failure to Furnish Statements of Co-Accused and Retraction Letters.

17 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Deepak Bapu Keluskar, challenged a detention order dated 29th September 2014 passed by the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenue — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution of India and Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. The court held that the detaining authority must ensure the detenue understands the grounds of detention to make an effective representation; failure to do so renders the detention illegal.

31 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Shrenika, wife of the detenue Sri. Huchappa @ Dhanaraj Kalebag, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Acquittal in Criminal Cases Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority did not consider material fact of acquittal in two criminal cases, vitiating subjective satisfaction.

2 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Ashok Dadu Mangale, challenged a detention order dated 3/3/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai under Section 3(2)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Detenu's History of Criminal Cases Does Not Justify Preventive Detention When Bail Was Granted in Most Cases and No Material Shows Inadequacy of Regular Law.

7 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Mohammad Shafiulla, father of the detenu Roshan Jameer @ Jameer @ Jammu, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Const...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Bootlegging Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(2) of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 set aside as grounds did not show that ordinary law was insufficient to prevent the detenu from acting prejudicially.

12 Jul 2024

The petitioner, wife of Sharath @ Sharath Kumar, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detenti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Right to Representation and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 Was Not Communicated, Rendering Detention Illegal.

8 Dec 2025

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Prathiba Talapati, wife of the detenu Sri. Dawood Nadaf, challenging the preventive detention order dated 03.06.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Detenu's Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA — Upholds Detention Order Based on Smuggling of Foreign Currency and Gold. The court held that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was valid and the procedural safeguards under Article 22(5) were complied with.

22 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Imtiyaz Hussain, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and the delay in passing the order vitiated the subjective satisfaction.

23 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Samad Salim Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under Section 3(2) of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders in Red Sanders Smuggling Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether bail conditions or other measures would suffice.

28 Jun 2013

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus petitions challenging preventive detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)