Search Results for "jurisdictional precondition"

67 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 67 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations

The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Holding Anticipatory Bail Maintainable Despite Custody in Another Case. Person in Custody Cannot Apprehend Arrest and Thus Cannot Seek Pre-Arrest Bail Under Section 438 CrPC.

The Supreme Court considered the question of whether an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner Company Failed to Show Perversity or Jurisdictional Error in Awards Granting Relief to Workmen.

The petitioner, Electropneumatics And Hydraulics India Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging separate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Bogus Purchases Case — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Settlement Commission's Discretion to Accept Additional Income Disclosure Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961 Upheld as Not Perverse or Unreasonable.

The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 21 September 201...