Search Results for "item 6 Schedule IV"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "item 6 Schedule IV"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Maharashtra State Electricity Board Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Contractual Employees. Employer's failure to confer permanency on telephone operators working since 1996 constitutes unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

4 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), challenged a common judgment and order of the Industrial Court, which allowed complaints f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by State Government Challenging Regularization of Daily Wagers. Industrial Court's direction to grant permanent status to daily wagers who worked for years under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act is upheld as no unfair labour practice was committed.

23 Apr 2015

The case involves three writ petitions filed by the Government of Maharashtra and Government Polytechnic College, Arvi, challenging a common judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

6 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses State's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Regularization of Daily Wage Workers. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that non-regularization of workers employed for years constitutes unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

7 Jan 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra and its Public Works Department challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Ahme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Alleging Unfair Labour Practice by Employer. Company's denial of permanency to 15 workmen held not to constitute unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as workmen failed to prove continuous service.

14 Jul 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra Association of General Workers, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated November 20,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Directing Permanent Absorption of Temporary Employee in University of Mumbai. Employer's Practice of Engaging Temporary Employees for Years Without Regularisation Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

28 Jan 2005

The University of Mumbai (Petitioner) challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th December 1999, which allowed a complaint filed by Shri S....

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)