Search Results for "investor compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "investor compensation"

28 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Azim Premji for Lack of Authority to File on Behalf of Company. Managing Director's Authority to Sue Required Board Resolution as per Articles of Association.

12 May 2016

The suit was filed by Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. (Plaintiff No.1) and its Managing Director R. Subramanian (Plaintiff No.2) against Azim Premji a...

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Lack of Counterclaim. The award was found patently illegal as it granted compensation to an investor who had not filed any claim or counterclaim, based on a misconception from conciliation proceedings.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a stockbroker's operational error in handling a Margin Trading Facility account for an investor, leading to the auction of shar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Majority Arbitral Award in Share Subscription Dispute — Put Option and Performance Clause Enforceable Despite Foreign Investment Regulations. The court dismissed a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the award did not contravene FEMA or SEBI regulations and was not against public policy.

11 Dec 2018

This judgment by the Bombay High Court deals with two connected arbitration petitions arising from a share subscription and shareholders agreement dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Investment in Shares of Private Company for Acquiring Control Held as Capital Asset, Not Stock-in-Trade. Shares held for 31 months with transfer restrictions cannot be treated as trading asset under Income Tax Act, 1961.

6 Sep 2013

The appellant, Accra Investments Private Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 25 April 2012 of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs SEBI to Investigate Alleged Securities Law Violations and Constitutes Expert Committee for Regulatory Strengthening. The Court ordered SEBI to probe specific issues including Rule 19A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957, and stock price manipulation, while establishing a committee to assess and improve investor protection mechanisms in response to market volatility.

2 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of petitions arising from significant investor wealth loss in the securities market, triggered by a steep decline ...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of BEST Undertaking Against Liquidator's Rejection of Interest Claim and Secured Creditor Status in Liquidation of Spark Green Energy. Interest-Free Deposit Does Not Attract Interest, and Unregistered Charge Does Not Confer Secured Status Under IBC.

1 Jan 2025

The appeal was filed by Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT Mumbai B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

7 Apr 2025

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Postal Authorities in Kisan Vikas Patra Fraud Case. Postal authorities not vicariously liable for agent's fraud as payment was made to holder under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and appellants' negligence in signing instruments contributed to loss.

7 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by Pradeep Kumar and Raj Rani against postal authorities, including the Post Master General and othe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

21 Apr 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)