Madras High Court Reserved Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Filed Under Article 226 Challenging Dismissal Orders. Petitioners from Various Town Panchayats Sought Quashing of Termination Orders and Reinstatement with Backwages.
23 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "internet cards"
48 result(s) found
Found 48 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat Order in Banking Fraud Compensation Claim — Jurisdiction of Permanent Lok Adalat Under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Raised Due to Alleged Criminal Misconduct by Third Parties. The dispute involved unauthorised online transfers from a bank account enabled by a duplicate SIM issued without consent, leading to claims for compensation and questions on the Lok Adalat's adjudicatory powers in fraud cases.
1 Jun 2026The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging the order of the Perm...
High Court
Madras High Court Considers Writ Petitions for Mandamus and Certiorari Regarding Street Vendors' Town Vending Committee Elections. Petitions Seek Enforcement of Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 and Associated Rules, and Challenge Election Notice for Procedural Irregularities.
7 Mar 2025The judgment involves three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The...
- 28
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decides Tax Deduction at Source Liability for Cellular Mobile Service Providers Under Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Court clarified that obligation under Section 194-H requires principal-agent relationship between payer and payee as per Section 182 of Contract Act, 1872, and payments must be for services in buying/selling goods or asset transactions, not being securities.
28 Feb 2024The Supreme Court delivered a common judgment addressing appeals by the Revenue and assessees, who were cellular mobile telephone service providers, c...
- 276
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against Dream 11 for Alleged Gambling and GST Evasion. Fantasy Sports Held to be Game of Skill, Not Gambling Under Public Gambling Act, 1867.
30 Apr 2019The petitioner, a public-spirited advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to initiate criminal prosecution against Dream 11 Fa...
- 188
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Telecom Tower Installation in Residential Area Under Section 419 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Municipal Corporation Cannot Refuse Permission Based on Unauthorized Policy Restricting Towers in Residential Zones. Held that the power to grant permission under Section 419 is quasi-judicial and must be exercised reasonably, and a blanket ban on telecom towers in residential areas is ultra vires the Act.
26 Sep 2017The petitioner, Bharti Airtel Limited, a telecom service provider, sought permission from the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to install a teleco...
- 54
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.
17 Dec 2014On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...
- 18
High Court
- 10
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.
17 Dec 2014The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...
- 19
