WRIT PETITION NO. 10475 OF 2011
7 Mar 2012The case involved a partnership firm (Petitioner) engaged in manufacturing soft gelatin pharmaceutical products, and a US corporation (Respondent No.1...
Search Results for "international commercial dispute"
1240 result(s) found
Found 1240 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Held to be Dubai, UAE, Not India, Based on Express Terms of Distributorship Agreement.
15 Nov 2024The present petition was filed under Section 11(6)(a) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...
- 372
High Court
Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Assignee Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Assignment of Contractual Rights and Arbitration Agreement Valid Under Sudanese Law; Respondent's Public Policy Challenge Rejected.
27 Nov 2024The petitioner, Neilan International Co Ltd, a Sudanese company, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 27 September 2018 passed by the ...
- 508
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Enforcement of Foreign Award on Grounds of Arbitrator Bias — Upholds High Court Order. Alleged Conflict of Interest of Presiding Arbitrator Not Sufficient to Refuse Enforcement Under Section 48(2)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Mar 2024The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award. The dispute arose from a Share Subscription Agreement bet...
- 798
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Indian Courts Lack Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Seated in Colombia Governed by Colombian Law.
18 Mar 2025The petitioner, Disortho S.A.S., a Colombian company, and the respondent, Meril Life Science Private Limited, an Indian company, entered into an Inter...
- 833
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute Over Applicability of Part-I of Arbitration Act. Part-I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Inapplicable Where Parties Chose Mumbai as Venue for Convenience but Arbitration Governed by ICC Rules.
9 Jul 2013The case involves two appeals arising from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a petition filed by Konkola Copper...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge's Order in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute — Parties Did Not Exclude Part-I of Arbitration Act by Choosing Foreign Law and Seat Abroad. The Court held that under the Bhatia International regime, Part-I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to international commercial arbitrations held outside India unless expressly or impliedly excluded, and mere choice of foreign law and seat does not constitute implied exclusion.
6 Aug 2013The appeal arose from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15 November 2011, which held that the Court had no jurisdict...
- 99
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Case Involving Breach of Settlement Deed. The Court held that the arbitration qualified as an international commercial arbitration under Section 2(1)(f) and that judicial interference under Section 34 was unwarranted, restoring the award of US$ 1.5 million as liquidated damages for breach of the Deed of Settlement dated 03.01.2011.
10 Nov 2021The dispute arose from a soured business association between shareholders in Atlas Equifin Private Limited, India, which held shares in Multi Screen M...
- 217
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Section 9 Petition in Post-Foreign Award Enforcement Against Guarantor Deleted from Proceedings. Court Examines Applicability of Group of Companies Doctrine to Bind Non-Signatory for Interim Relief.
28 Jan 2026The petition was filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Ningbo Aux Imp & Exp Co. Ltd., a Chinese company, seeking inte...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Anti-Arbitration Injunction in Facilitation Deed Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Has Competence to Decide Validity of Underlying Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
17 Sep 2010The appeal arises from a commercial dispute between MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (Sony) and World Sport Group (Mauritius) Limited (WSG) concerni...
- 79
