Search Results for "insufficiently stamped"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Stamp Duty in Specific Performance Suit. Agreement for Sale Recognized Prior Possession, Thus Stamp Duty Payable Under Article 5(e)(ii) of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, Not as Conveyance Under Article 5(e)(i).

The dispute originated from a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 23.06.2018 filed by respondent No.1 against the petitioner and other...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Article 227 Cannot Override Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Supreme Court Restores Plaint Wrongly Struck Off by High Court (2026 INSC 121)

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in striking off the plaint under Article 227 of the Constitution when a specific remedy under Order V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Unregistered Relinquishment Deed Invalid: Daughter’s Coparcenary Rights Upheld | Karnataka HC (RFA No.100096/2019, 2026)

The plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/5th share in ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties, along ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Agreement to Sell Not a Deemed Conveyance Without Transfer of Possession | Tenant’s Possession Not Sufficient | Supreme Court (2026 INSC 59)

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Vayyaeti Srinivasarao and set aside the judgment of the High Court, which had affirmed the Trial C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The Court held that the plaint disclosed triable issues regarding mortgage, power of attorney revocation, and jurisdiction, and could not be rejected at the threshold.

The appellant, Vinod Infra Developers Ltd., claimed ownership of agricultural land in Jodhpur and alleged that it had borrowed Rs. 7.5 crores from res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Inherent Powers of Courts to Recall Insufficiently Stamped Evidence. Key Judgment on the Reassessment of Admitted Documents in Civil Proceedings to Prevent Revenue Loss

This civil appeal addresses whether a court can recall the admission of an instrument as evidence, which was marked as an exhibit despite being insuff...