Search Results for "initial detention period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "initial detention period"

182 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Bootlegging Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(2) of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 set aside as grounds did not show that ordinary law was insufficient to prevent the detenu from acting prejudicially.

12 Jul 2024

The petitioner, wife of Sharath @ Sharath Kumar, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detenti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenue — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution of India and Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. The court held that the detaining authority must ensure the detenue understands the grounds of detention to make an effective representation; failure to do so renders the detention illegal.

31 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Shrenika, wife of the detenue Sri. Huchappa @ Dhanaraj Kalebag, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation — Right Under Article 22(5) Violated. The Court held that the 60-day delay in considering the detenue's representation by the Central Government was unexplained and vitiated the detention order.

15 May 2023

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against a preventive detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Violation of Section 3(2) Proviso — Initial Detention Cannot Exceed Six Months. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act mandates an initial detention period of only six months, and a 12-month initial order is illegal.

3 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Himanshu Roy, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, on 30 July 2022, confirmed by the State of Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

26 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Detenu's Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA — Upholds Detention Order Based on Smuggling of Foreign Currency and Gold. The court held that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was valid and the procedural safeguards under Article 22(5) were complied with.

22 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Imtiyaz Hussain, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Article 22(5). The court held that failure to communicate grounds of detention in a language understood by the detenu renders the detention illegal.

29 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Yashoda, wife of the detenu Keshava Poojary @ Choni, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act for Dangerous Person. Detention Order Based on Past Criminal Activities and In-Camera Statements Upheld as Valid Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

21 Oct 2010

The petitioner, brother of the detenue Surendra @ Surya Daulat Desai, challenged a detention order dated 15th March 2010 issued by the Commissioner of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Forfeiture of Property Under SAFEMA Despite Revocation of Detention Order. Property of Detenu Forfeited Under Sections 7 and 19(1) of SAFEMA Upheld as Detention Order Was Valid When Forfeiture Order Was Passed.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Smt. Padma Nirmal Agarwal, challenged the forfeiture of a flat (Flat No.16, 471/C, Manu Mahal, King's Circle, Mumbai) under the Smuggl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Unexplained Delay. Failure to supply relied-upon documents and inordinate delay between proposal and order snapped live link, rendering detention order invalid under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

1 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Soud Ahmad Juber Ahmad Khan, challenged a detention order dated 16th September 2004 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)