Search Results for "industrial jurisprudence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "industrial jurisprudence"

411 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 411 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Tribunal Rejecting Plea for Award on Majority Settlement. Industrial Tribunal Found Majority Settlement Voluntary but Held It Not Binding on Non-Signatory Union Members Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Jan 2026

The management of Caterpillar India Private Limited, a multinational manufacturing off-road vehicles, and its recognized union, Caterpillar India Priv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Transfer Dispute Under MRTU & PULP Act — Issuance of Transfer Order at Mumbai Confers Jurisdiction. Transfer order issued at Mumbai to employee posted in Rajasthan held to confer jurisdiction on Industrial Court at Mumbai under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

19 Sep 2025

The petition was filed by Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, challenging an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai dated 4 May 2022...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Retrenchment of School Employee Falls Under MRTU & PULP Act, Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction. The court held that termination without following Section 5 of MEPS Act constitutes retrenchment under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, exclusively triable by Industrial Court.

13 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Neena B. Rangnekar, was employed as a Junior Clerk with respondent no.1 Trust from 1 February 1989 and later promoted to Senior Clerk....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Miscellaneous First Appeals Filed by Acquiring Authority Against Enhanced Compensation Awarded by Reference Court in Land Acquisition Cases — Appeals Filed Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894

8 Jan 2018

These miscellaneous first appeals were filed by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

6 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Denying Locus Standi to Employees in Reference Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Individual Workmen Have No Independent Right to Prosecute Reference but Industrial Court Must Exercise Discretion to Hear Them if Interests Affected.

6 Nov 2006

The petitioners, employees of Empress Mills Retail Sales Division, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th October 1995 which held that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of 77 Employees Seeking Permanency Against Nagpur Municipal Corporation — Seasonal Workers Not Entitled to Automatic Permanent Status Under Model Standing Orders. The Court held that the burden of proving continuous service of 240 days in the preceding year was not discharged and the employer's classification of workers as seasonal was not arbitrary.

22 Mar 2006

The petitioners, 77 employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 13.12.1994 of the Industrial Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Challenging Reinstatement Order. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor System, Termination Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

17 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 17/9/1999, which reversed the Labou...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.

1 Jan 1970

Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)