Search Results for "individual workman"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "individual workman"

228 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 228 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. Court upholds award of damages for breach of contract under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, finding no error of law or jurisdiction.

5 Dec 2023

The petitioner, a company, challenged an arbitral award passed in favor of the respondent, an individual, under Article 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding That Petitioner Was Not a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act — Transfer Order Not Challenged on Merits. The court held that the nature of duties performed by the petitioner, including supervision and administrative functions, excluded him from the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

28 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Sunil Jagannath Tale, along with 19 other employees, filed a complaint of unfair labour practices under the Maharashtra Recognition of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Five Workmen as Protected Workmen — Trade Union Must Be Registered Under Trade Unions Act, 1926 to Claim Protection Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that an unregistered trade union cannot seek declaration of its office bearers as protected workmen under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Nov 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Wonderla Holidays Limited, a public limited company running amusement parks, challenged an order dated 16.09.2017 passed by the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Order Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Scope of Incidental Issues in Computation of Benefits. The court held that the Labour Court can decide incidental issues such as interpretation of settlements when computing benefits under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as the workman's right to continuity of service had been established.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Force Motors Ltd., challenged an order of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which granted ce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Novartis India Ltd. in Transfer Dispute. Medical Sales Representative Held to be Workman Concerned Under Section 33(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

21 Dec 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Novartis India Ltd. challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal on a complaint under Section 33-A of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Employee Abandoned Service by Taking Up Employment Abroad Without Intimation. Clause 13.4 of Certified Standing Orders Validly Invoked to Terminate Employment for Abandonment of Service Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

3 Aug 2006

The Petitioner, Infomedia India Ltd., engaged the First Respondent as a machine operator at its printing establishment in Mumbai. On 22 June 1992, the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to Reinstatement with 50% Backwages and Workman's Challenge to Enquiry Validity in Industrial Dispute. Labour Court's Finding of Non-Perverse Enquiry Upheld, Reinstatement with Partial Backwages Affirmed Under Industrial Disputes Act.

24 Aug 2005

The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from an industrial dispute between Siemens Limited (the company) and its workman, Babulal Ramlal Walm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Workman in Industrial Dispute — Termination Due to Continued Ill Health Not Retrenchment. Termination on ground of continued ill health falls within exception to retrenchment under Section 2(oo) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and compliance with Section 25F is not required.

21 Jun 2005

The appellant, Ramaswamy Murugesh, was employed as a Fitter in the Assembling Department of M/s. Consolidated Pneumatic Tools Co. India Ltd. (the empl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Relief in Industrial Dispute from Reinstatement to Compensation. Termination Based on Security Report Did Not Justify Reinstatement; High Court Erred in Upholding Tribunal's Discretionary Order Without Interference.

18 Dec 1969

The case arose out of a reference to the Industrial Tribunal concerning the termination of service of A. K. Roy, a skilled workman employed by Hindust...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Reference in Employer-Workman Dispute Under U.P. Industrial Disputes Act — Individual Grievance Not Industrial Dispute. A Dispute Between an Employer and a Single Workman Does Not Fall Within the Definition of 'Industrial Dispute' Under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Unless Espoused by a Body or Considerable Section of Workmen.

20 Mar 1957

This case concerned a challenge to the validity of a reference made by the Government under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to the Industrial ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)