Search Results for "independent screening"

110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Resolution to Re-Advertise Industrial Plot — Petitioner's Application for Plot B-12 Wrongly Ignored Due to Irregularities in Screening Committee Process.

The petitioners, Gaonkar Chemicals and its proprietor Jaisatchitanand Gaonkar, filed a writ petition challenging Resolution No.26/21 dated 24 Septembe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Copyright Infringement Claim Against Film 'Umeed' — No Substantial Similarity Found. Court holds that ideas and themes are not copyrightable under the Copyright Act, 1957, and that the plaintiff failed to establish access or copying.

The plaintiff, Shivani Tibrewala, a writer/director, filed a suit alleging copyright infringement by the defendants, Rajat Mukherjee and others, in re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Negligence Finding Against Hospital and Doctors for Failure to Conduct ROP Screening on Preterm Baby Leading to Blindness. Compensation Enhanced for Child's Total Blindness Due to Negligent Omission of Mandatory Retinopathy of Prematurity Check-Up.

The case arises from a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against Maharaja Agrasen Hospital and its doctors for failing to conduct mandato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer Based on Overall Service Record and Adverse Entry. Single Censure Entry for Judicial Error Can Justify Compulsory Retirement Under Rule 56(C) of U.P. Fundamental Rules.

The appellant, Ram Murti Yadav, a judicial officer of the rank of Additional District and Sessions Judge, challenged his compulsory retirement at the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disciplinary Order Against Railway Employee Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Independent Application of Mind by Disciplinary Authority. Disciplinary Authority Acted at Behest of Vigilance Department Without Independent Reasoning, Rendering the Penalty of Removal Unsustainable.

The petitioner, a railway employee, was appointed as a Junior Porter in 1989 and promoted to Senior Porter in 1992 and Cabin Master in 1997. In 2000, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Was Frustrated by Delayed Consideration and Failure to Supply Relevant Documents.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mavin Keezhil Mohamed Aslam, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...