Search Results for "income discrepancy"

127 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 127 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Prior Recording of Reasons. Reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Reasons Not Recorded Before Issuance of Notice.

The petitioner, M/s. Indusind Media & Communications Ltd., filed its return of income for assessment year 2007-08, which was revised and subsequently ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reassessment Case on Limitation and Computation Grounds. Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Valid as Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts, and Notice Served on Partnership Firm Was Proper Despite Section 282(2) Argument.

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, involving a partnership firm engaged in publishing newspapers and peri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for reassessment of derivative transaction loss set aside as Assessing Officer had already examined the issue during original assessment.

The petitioner, Shrikant Phulchand Bhakkad (HUF), through its Karta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Customs Sepoy for Disproportionate Assets and Wife for Abetment. Assets worth ₹1.15 crore found disproportionate to known income; wife convicted for aiding acquisition under Section 109 IPC read with Prevention of Corruption Act.

The case involves two appeals by Suresh Vinayak Morajkar (a Sepoy in the Customs & Central Excise Department) and his wife Sushma Suresh Morajkar agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses RTI Activist's Petition Seeking Income Tax Returns of Public Figure. Holds That Personal Information of Third Party Cannot Be Disclosed Unless Larger Public Interest Is Established Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Shailesh Gandhi, an RTI activist and former Central Information Commissioner, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BDA Cancellation of EWS Site Allotment for Income Discrepancy — Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that cancellation without proper hearing is unsustainable and directed execution of sale deed upon payment of balance.

The petitioner, Smt. S.P. Mahadevamma, applied for allotment of an EWS (Economically Weaker Section) site under the Bangalore Development Authority (B...