Search Results for "incentive schemes"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "incentive schemes"

47 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Incentive Withdrawal Case — Policy Change Upheld as Prospective and in Public Interest. The Court held that the impugned notification was not retrospective and promissory estoppel did not bar the government from modifying the incentive scheme for Kutch industries.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India against the common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had quashed Notificatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Withdrawal of incentive bonus without lawful revision held to be unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

28 Nov 2025

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through its General Manager of BEST, challenged the judgment and order dated 14 February 2008 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Industrial Incentive Dispute — Concessional Electricity Rate Not Available to Existing Enterprises Undergoing Substantial Expansion Under Himachal Pradesh Industrial Policy, 2019. The Court held that Clause 16(a) of the Industrial Policy applies only to new enterprises, and the doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot be invoked to compel the State to provide incentives without an enabling notification.

25 May 2026

The State of Himachal Pradesh and its departments appealed against the High Court's judgment that directed them to provide concessional electricity ra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sales Tax Incentive Scheme Withdrawal — No Promissory Estoppel Against Policy Change in Public Interest. The court held that the withdrawal of a general sales tax incentive scheme by the State Government was valid and not violative of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by industrial units (M/s. Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd., M/s. Chandrapur Vidyut Conductors Private Ltd....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Cases — Holds That Arm's Length Price Determination Must Be Based on Reliable Comparable Data and Functional Analysis. The Tribunal's deletion of adjustments was upheld as it correctly applied functional comparability and permissible adjustments under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 10B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.

5 Dec 2014

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders of the Income Tax...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds MEP Notification for Iron Ore and Steel Products as Valid Exercise of Power Under Foreign Trade Act. Court holds that Minimum Export Price is a reasonable condition for export licensing and does not violate fundamental rights.

25 Jan 2016

The petitioners, JSW Steel Limited and Welspun Tradings Limited, along with their officers, challenged the constitutional validity of the Minimum Expo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 80-IB for Duty Drawback and DEPB Receipts. Court Held That Duty Drawback and DEPB Receipts Are Profits Derived From Business Under Section 80-IB of Income Tax Act, 1961, as They Reimburse Manufacturing and Exporting Costs, Following Meghalaya Steels Limited and Topman Exports Precedents.

10 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by an assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting wooden handicraft items, against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)